[MT] Re: Gamut

This last weekend I was working with someone and tried the *new* quick
method but got absolutely nowhere with him, so tried the basic EFT but
without the 9-gamut and got a tiny response, so included the 9-gamut in
the next round and got a much better response. Sometimes, it does seem
as thought taking the longer route can have better results, but it
depends on the individual, as - I suppose - with pretty well everything.

In message <002301bf2630$654a0a20$ea6e38d4_at_bmwczotz>, chris hardisty
<chris_at_hardisty.force9.co.uk> writes
>Hi everyone,
>Whilst I appreciate that, in numerous cases, one doesn't need the 9-Gamut, I
>am in agreement with Silvia that it may, just may, have something to do with
>more experienced practitioners being attuned in some way to their clients.
>As I teach my clients to use it on themselves at home, I feel it is
>important for them to do it the original way when I am not there with them.
>After all, it's worked wonderfully for all of us for so long, why re-invent
>the wheel. Of course, if it is working when clients using it the new way
>on

-- 
Hilary Jupp
http://members.xoom.com/wolfhounds